Hawaii looks far more likely to move on HR117 or its companions HCR137, SCR205, and SR170, which have been favorably received. All request the Department of Business, Economic Development, and Tourism compile a short list of Fortune 500 companies and multi-national corporations suitable to relocate to Hawaii.
Additionally, the department should identify means and incentives to entice these businesses to relocate to the Aloha State.
The measure lists other states that use incentives to lure certain businesses to the state, though it doesn’t say how successful those efforts have been. Examples include:
- Florida, which offers discretionary grant funding to businesses that invest at least $50 million and create at least 50 jobs in the state in a three-year period
- Kentucky, which provides income tax credits to regional and national headquarter firms that can offset up to 100% of corporate income tax liability
- Louisiana, which provides a rebate of up to 25% of facilities and relocation costs over five years
Though none are mentioned in the bill, sales tax incentives are relatively common. Back when Amazon was looking to build fulfillment centers around the country, before states had the authority to tax remote sales, several states agreed to let Amazon’s sales go (temporarily) untaxed if the company developed a physical presence in the state and created a certain number of jobs — even though physical presence normally triggers a tax collection obligation.
When Boeing announced it would expand operations in Missouri, its home state of Washington promised it billions in state and local tax breaks to stay. After it moved anyway, Boeing received tax breaks from Missouri. In 2015, North Carolina exempted sales of jet fuel and aviation gasoline to interstate air businesses to entice them to refuel in the Tar Heel State. The list goes on.
At this time, Hawaii isn’t proposing any concrete incentives: “The State should explore all possible incentives to lure well-paying jobs and investment to Hawaii.”